What's even scarier is the possibility that HE doesn't even know it.
Of the seemingly countless lessons that should be learned from the Steubenville rape case, perhaps one of the most important is that our sons and daughters need to know what rape is, and that it's wrong. They need to know, boys and girls alike, that no matter how a girl is dressed, or how drunk or high she is, or how much she flirts, that she is not "asking for it," and it is NOT ok to have sex with her without her express consent. The inability to say "no" is not implied consent. The inability to speak coherently, or to speak at all, is not implied consent. In fact, there IS NO "implied" consent. There is only consent. Black and white. Yes or no.
I think (hope) that we can all agree that what those two boys did is wrong. What's even more disturbing, however, is the number of other teenagers who were involved: planning to get the victim to the party and get her drunk, watching, laughing, and even taking pictures and distributing them on the internet. At seemingly no point did anyone think this is wrong and try to put a stop to it. Instead, they egged the boys on, took pictures, and sent texts to their friends about what was going on at the party. Even after Sunday's guilty verdict, Trent Mays' apology refused to take responsibility for the rape, instead only owning up to taking the pictures and sending them out. It seems clear that the boys, as well as the other partygoers, didn't consider what they were doing rape.
While frightening, it's unfortunately not surprising. CNN's coverage of the verdict sounds more like a lament for the poor, misunderstood teenage boys than it does a celebration of justice for a 16-year-old girl who was sexually assaulted. The clip starts out innocently enough, with CNN anchor Candy Crowley commenting on the emotional climate in the courtroom as the verdict was read, and reporter Poppy Harlow agreeing that it was "incredibly emotional" and "incredibly difficult, even for an outsider" to watch as the verdict was read. Lest you find yourself nodding in sympathy for the victim and her family, however, Harlow quickly clues you in to the REAL victims in this case: the two "promising" young men who "litrally" watched their "lives fall apart." It just gets worse from there.
Lady, I got news for you: when you're convicted of sexually assaulting an underage girl, your life SHOULD fall apart. Yes, it's sad that they made the choices they made, and I'm sure their families are extremely emotional, but I cannot imagine that their pain holds a candle to that of a girl that was raped, naked pictures and videos of her distributed among her peers and all over the internet. As the mother of a young girl, I can also not imagine what her parents must feel. Harlow isn't the only one who misplaces blame, either; a good friend of mine discussed the case and its media coverage with some of her law students, and the majority of them indicated that they considered the attack the girl's fault. Their responses varied from "she was drunk" to "she was asking for it" and everywhere in between, but an alarming number of these teenagers, girls included, placed at least part of the blame on the victim. Even the well-known satirical news outlet The Onion noted, , more than two years ago, that our culture tends to marginalize the victim in favor of the handsome, popular athlete. If this young woman had been assaulted by a stranger on the street, no one would say it was ok. If she had been male, and sexually assaulted by her classmates, no one would say it was ok. But somehow, because she made poor decisions in the company of people she knew and trusted, we are able to rationalize the boys' actions.
I'm not naive. I'm around teenagers all day. Hell, I was one myself not all THAT long ago. I'm not clueless enough to think that my daughter will never make poor decisions, or lie to me, or even find herself in a similar situation to the victim of these two young men. I find that I'm terrified of that possibility, not because I don't trust future Charlotte's future decisions, but because I don't trust the culture and society that will shelter her as she makes her future decisions and, yes, future mistakes. I don't trust the way our society treats its women, and I am enraged that those who point out the discrimination are so frequently branded "feminists" or "radicals." Why is it so radical to ask that every person is treated with respect, regardless of what body parts he or she was born with?
I'm also terrified, perhaps even more so, to be the mother of a boy in that same society. It is MY responsibility to teach him how to view and behave toward women. It might seem like overkill to worry about that now, when he's two months old, but I can't help feeling like every lesson I teach him now will shape him into the brother, friend, boyfriend, and husband that he will become. I'm sure that neither of the mothers of the two Steubenville football players ever looked at her son in his cradle and wished for him to one day become a rapist. They probably didn't sit next to them in the courtroom and think of their sons, 16 and 17 years old, as rapists. But somewhere along the way, that's exactly what those boys became. And while I believe that the boys must take responsibility for their actions, I also wonder if parents should bear at least some responsibility for the men and women their children become. It is up to us, after all, to teach our children right and wrong, and to take responsibility for their actions and own up to their mistakes. I know that I am the person I am today largely because of the lessons my parents taught me, and the experiences and opportunities that I had because of them. And I know that I feel that burden every time I look at my son and daughter. I can only hope that I carry it well, that I can guide my children to become valuable, conscientious members of society...and that society respects and values them in return.